Why it might work
A cash state may avoid part of a major decline while retaining some upside.
Leveraged ETF research · Research strategy
Tests twenty daily rules for switching between leveraged technology exposure and cash.
The idea
Uses completed daily market indicators to decide whether the portfolio holds TECL or cash.
A cash state may avoid part of a major decline while retaining some upside.
A frozen rule selects TECL when its conditions hold.
The rule moves to settled cash when conditions fail.
Individual rules
Each rule has its own explanation and dated research history.
Daily
Tracks XLK against its 200-day average with a 1% buffer and waits for repeated closes before changing position. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Daily
Starts with half-sized TECL during an XLK recovery, then increases exposure after confirmation while held. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Daily
Uses XLK's adaptive moving average and its slope to decide when to hold TECL. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Daily
Looks for an XLK breakout above its prior 55-day channel while the long trend is positive. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Weekly
Reviews three XLK trend votes weekly and scales TECL exposure in thirds, with a daily risk exit. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Weekly
Reviews a technology growth-versus-drag score weekly to choose cash, half, or nearly full TECL exposure. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Weekly
Adjusts TECL position size weekly using its recent volatility, subject to an XLK long-trend gate. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Daily
A daily TECL-and-cash allocation rule studied in the TECL v4 research. The final study did not qualify it for selection. Rule details are private.
Weekly
Uses XLK's medium-term return and variance ratio to set TECL exposure at cash, half, or nearly full size. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Daily
Combines a long-trend TECL position with rapid exits after sharp XLK losses and a staged recovery entry. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Daily
Buys a short oversold XLK reading only while its longer trend remains positive. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Daily
Waits for XLK to fall below its lower volatility band and then recover above it. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Daily
Looks for an XLK volatility contraction followed by a 20-day breakout. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Daily
Requires an XLK price breakout and unusually strong volume before holding TECL. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Weekly
Uses XLK's strength relative to the broad market to decide whether to hold TECL. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Weekly
Sizes TECL based on whether semiconductor and software funds confirm the technology trend. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Weekly
Counts trend confirmations across technology, broad growth, semiconductor, and software ETFs. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Weekly
Applies a credit-market and rate-sensitive brake to an XLK-trend TECL allocation. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Daily
Uses XLK trend for entry and TECL's own high-water mark to trim or exit after a gain reverses. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Daily
Combines four independently tracked TECL rules in one shared-cash portfolio. The final study did not qualify this rule for selection.
Selected research result
20 frozen candidate rules were tested. None passed all qualification gates. Baseline and benchmark figures in the source report are not presented as candidate performance.
Research history
Repeated and diagnostic runs remain accessible under their tested variant. No run is selected by highest return.
20 frozen candidate rules were tested. None passed all qualification gates. Baseline and benchmark figures in the source report are not presented as candidate performance.
Read result